Connect with us

Pakistan

Unprecedented condemnation of UK Home Secretary’s racist anti-Pakistan rhetoric

Published

on

LONDON: Faith leaders, community groups, professional forums and activists have come together to issue unprecedented condemnation of the Home Secretary Suella Braverman’s racist, Islamophobic, irresponsible and divisive rhetoric on child sexual exploitation linking it with Pakistanis.

The Home Secretary’s racist and inflammatory comments from a series of interviews last week have been labelled as “inflammatory and divisive rhetoric that is sensationalist and contradicts her own department’s evidence”.

Pakistani organisations have been joined by British Nigerian, British Indian, British Bengali and others in mounting condemnation of the Home Secretary, arguing that the Home Secretary’s rhetoric overlooks the impact “cuts in public sector and community services under the current government have had on young people increasing their vulnerability”.

British Pakistan Foundation (BPF) has called on Prime Minister Rishi Sunak to distance himself from Braverman’s extremist rhetoric and issue an apology to British Pakistanis.

The Muslim Women’s network and others who have evidenced and worked with Asian victims of grooming have commented: “The Home Secretary’s approach of demonising an entire community and lending credibility to far-right narratives undermine the need to ensure all victims of CSE are protected and all perpetrators are brought to justice.”

Whilst Community organizations across England, Wales and Scotland labelled the Home Secretary’s approach as “an act of collective punishment for the reprehensible acts of a few,” senior leaders from the world of finance and business called on the Prime Minister to withdraw the Home Secretary’s remarks arguing that a failure to do so would be viewed as “a government led by you seen as encouraging and normalising bigotry targeted at British Pakistanis”.

In a letter to PM Sunak, the British Pakistan Foundation said its 18,000 strong members wanted action from the PM.

The letter by the BPF said: “We are writing to you to share our deep concern and disappointment at the Home Secretary’s recent comments and for you not speaking out against them. These comments singled out only the involvement of British Pakistani males in so-called “grooming gangs” and “holding cultural values totally at odds with “British values”.

“A report commissioned by the Home Office in 2020, entitled “The characteristics of group-based child sexual exploitation in the community”, concluded that the majority of child sexual exploitation offenders are White and further went on to note that, despite some high-profile cases, links between ethnicity and this form of offending cannot be proven. The NSPCC’s Chief Executive warned that the further entrenchment of such a narrative could create ‘new blind spots that prevent victims from being identified’. Further, the National Policing lead on child sexual abuse emphasised that ‘child abusers come from all parts of our society and sadly most abuse happens in the home’.

“These conclusions are supported by the conviction last week of 21 individuals of both genders and from “white” British ethnicity, who over a decade sexually abused young children in Walsall.”

The letter added: “Recent examples of violence rooted in the ethnicity narrative include the riots outside a hotel housing migrant in Knowsley (February 2023), the firebomb attack on an immigration centre in Dover (November 2022), the massacre in Christchurch, New Zealand (March 2019), the attack on a crowd close to Finsbury Park Mosque (January 2018) and the murder of an innocent 81-year-old man in Rotherham (August 2015). The divisive and dangerous way in which the Home Secretary is seeking to portray all British Pakistani males and insinuating that the community is complicit in their actions is reprehensible. We, therefore, ask you to immediately clarify the Home Secretary’s claims and ask her to withdraw her remarks. We also ask for your prompt engagement with the British Pakistani community, and others, on this issue to ensure that the Home Secretary’s irresponsible words, and a government led by you, are not seen as encouraging and normalising bigotry targeted at British Pakistanis.”

Dozens of leading Muslim organisations have also written to the Prime Minister demanding an apology – or risk losing complete faith in the community.

The joint letter says the community is appalled at the Home Secretary’s recent comments where she described British Pakistani males as holding “cultural values totally at odds with British values who see women in a demeaned and illegitimate way and who pursue an outdated and frankly heinous approach in the way that they behave”.

The letter to the PM says: “These remarks and others were made by the Home Secretary without caveats and were not limited to those convicted of Child Sexual Exploitation (CSE) but instead stereotyped and targeted an entire community. We wholeheartedly condemn all those convicted of CSE and stand with the victims of child abuse. It is a shame for all in our country that 1 in 10 children have suffered sexual abuse and that half a million children are sexually exploited every year. The Home Secretary’s approach, however, of demonising an entire community and lending credibility to far-right narratives undermine the need to ensure all victims of CSE are protected and all perpetrators are brought to justice.

“The Home Secretary’s words are the latest in a long line of comments by her and others targeting communities with little regard for the real-life consequences that flow from such comments by politicians. Hate crime in the UK is on the rise with recent high-profile attacks in Dover and Knowsley following shortly after incendiary language from Ministers. In the past, unfounded rhetoric has had real world consequences. In 2019 a far-right terrorist in Christchurch, New Zealand wrote “for Rotherham” on his ammunition before opening fire at a mosque killing 51 people. In 2020 false rumours about “grooming” in Barrow led to far-right harassment of Asians in the town. The Home Secretary’s comment encourages the likelihood of such further attacks.

“The Home Secretary’s approach is an act of collective punishment for the reprehensible acts of a few. We therefore ask you to publicly distance yourself from the Home Secretary’s claims which are clearly unsubstantiated and ask you to withdraw her remarks. We also ask you to end your government’s policy of disengagement with British Muslims and ensure that the Home Secretary’s irresponsible words are not seen as yet another example of a government led by you, encouraging and normalising bigotry targeting your fellow British citizens.”

The joint letter has been penned by Muslim Women’s Network; Muslim Council of Wales; British Muslim Heritage Centre; Islamic Society of Britain; Bury Council of Mosques; Rochdale Council of Mosques; Liverpool Regional Mosque Network; West London Islamic Centre; London Muslim Forum; Cheadle Masjid; Ilford Islamic Centre; Wifaqul Ulama; Manchester Muslim Community; Woking Muslim Welfare Association; Zakariyya Jaami’e Masjid Bolton; Brent Muslim Burial Council; Apna Haq; Finsbury Mosque; Al Madina Mosque Barking; Masjid Anwar Blackburn; East End Islamic Centre; Masjid Bilal; Anjuman e Islamia Newham; Jamia Masjid Khizra Bury; The Worthing Masjid;

Muslim Council of Britain; Muslim Council of Scotland; Council of Sri Lankan Muslim Organisations; Federation Of Student Islamic Societies; Muslim Council of Southampton; Lancashire Council of Mosques; Shahjahan Mosque Woking; Bristol Muslim Strategic Leadership Group; Hazrat Sultan Bahu Trust; Pakistan Community Centre London; Union of Muslim Organisations; Walsall Federation of Muslim Organisations Leicester Muslim Engagement and Development; Rushmoor Muslim Association; Bait Mohammed Academy Blackburn; Quwwatul Islam Rotherham; Community Muslim Forum; Central Mosque Brent; Muhafiz Islamic Portal; Newham Muslim Forum; Masjid-E-Kuba; Masjid Al’ Habib; Masjid E Tauheed Manor Park; and Southampton Madina Mosque.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Elections

After a recount, PML-N keeps its seat in the Balochistan Assembly.

Published

on

By

The Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) was able to hold onto a seat in the Balochistan Assembly following a vote recount.

With a margin of 1919 votes, Muhammad Khan Lehri of the PML-N defeated Ghulam Rasool Imrani of the Pakistan People’s Party (PPP) to win PB-14 Nasirabad.

The Returning Officer (RO) reports that Ghulam Rasool Imrani of the PPP received 18787 votes, while Muhammad Khan Lehri received 20706 votes.

The PPP candidate contested the results, which prompted a vote recount request. Prior to this, on February 19, the PML-N narrowly prevailed in a vote recount to hold onto a seat in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Assembly by 186 votes.

Sardar Shah Jahan of the PML-N defeated independent Shakoor Naumani, who was sponsored by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), in PK-40 Mansehra. The Returning Officer (RO), acting on a request from the independent candidate supported by the PTI, ordered the recounting of results for 173 polling stations. Sardar Shah Jehan received 43104 votes, and Shakoor Naumani, who was endorsed by the PTI, received 42918.

Continue Reading

Latest News

Rahat Faeth Ali Khan receives a clean sheet from FIA

Published

on

By

According to the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA), there is no proof that well-known musician Rahat Fateh Ali Khan has engaged in any illicit behaviour, including money laundering or tax evasion.

Since there is no proof of any wrongdoing, the FIA has declared that it has completed its investigation into the popular singer’s alleged money-laundering and tax evasion case.

According to the recommendations made by the field inquiry unit, which suggested closing the investigation into Khan, the competent authority has approved the closure of the investigation into Rahat Ali Khan and other individuals, as confirmed by the Additional Director of the Federal Investigation Agency’s Lahore Zone.

The data that are now accessible include no information that would link Rahat Fateh Ali Khan to any illicit money smuggling operations.

The Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) Lahore has said that an investigation was opened in January of this year against Rahat Ali Khan and 182 other regular passengers who were leaving Lahore International Airport to find employment overseas. According to the report, information on frequent passengers served as the impetus for this inquiry, which had as its primary goal finding anybody engaged in money laundering or currency smuggling.

It is important to note that, based on their travel history, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) opened a money laundering and tax evasion investigation against well-known musician Rahat Fateh Ali Khan and others.

According to the FIA, the Deputy Director of Immigration at Allama Iqbal International Airport in Lahore supplied the information on 182 travellers. As a result, the investigation was started to find any regular travellers involved in cash smuggling or money laundering.

Rahat Fateh Ali Khan has paid taxes on all of his local and foreign income, according to sources at the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) and the Federal Institute of Agriculture (FIA).

Continue Reading

Law

A challenge to the Aurat March was dismissed by the Lahore High Court.

Published

on

By

The Lahore High Court rendered a decision on the appeal filed by citizen Azam butt about the prohibition on the Aurat March.

Deputy Commissioner Lahore and other parties were added as parties to the application.

The petitioner voiced worry that the peace and order situation would get worse as a result of the women’s march. According to the petitioner, Islamic society does not tolerate the banners and placards from the Aurat March.

The petitioner claims that the Constitution protects women’s rights and that initiatives are taken to enhance the welfare of women. The state must stop promoting the Aurat March in an immoral manner.

The court postponed making a ruling after rejecting the petition as inadmissible after hearing the opening statements. The ultimate ruling was rendered by Justice Shahid Karim.

Continue Reading

Trending